|
|
guest rating:  (7,2 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, 31-40 years; travel season:January 2012 |
 i paid 53 euro and the room needed renovation but it was very large. very easy to get to schuman despite the location - there is a direct bus route outside the hotel.
|
 hotel needs renovation - it is only worth staying here if the price is good |
|
|
guest rating:  (5,5 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, 41-50 years; travel season:June 2010 |
The location was very convenient.
|
| The shower did not work properly. Water temperature was never stabilized !! |
|
|
guest rating:  (2,4 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, travel season:May 2010 |
| Old facilities. Too expensive |
|
|
guest rating:  (3,8 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, 41-50 years; travel season:March 2010 |
The location
|
| The beds, linens and pillows. Hard to be worse than what they provide.
The TV.
Internet.
The smell of cigarettes. |
|
|
guest rating:  (5,6 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, 51-60 years; travel season:December 2009 |
| room is big but without any form of decoration, just a table a chair and a desk and a bench (witch looked to be not very clean) Windows were big but not clean. balcony looked old and not well maintained. Room was cold and no possibility to make it warmer. Whole hotel atmosphere was cold 'to clean' |
|
|
| guest rating: (5,8 of 10) |
| on business travelling as a couple, 41-50 years; travel season:January 2009 |
Very well heated, clean, comfortable beds, spacious rooms
|
| Needs modernizing & renovating |
|
|
guest rating:  (9,6 of 10) |
| on business travelling as a couple, 41-50 years; travel season:May 2008 |
| Very tasty breakfast |
|
|
guest rating:  (6,2 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, 41-50 years; travel season:April 2008 |
Good location. Large room, good price
|
| Rooms a bit frayed. Could hear neighboring room TV. Otherwise ok |
|
|
guest rating:  (3,3 of 10) |
| on business travelling as a couple, 51-60 years; travel season:January 2008 |
Well located in the city
|
| Curtains rip off.Not clean.
3 beds ?
Temperature extremelly high in the room. No possibility to decrease. Proposal from the reception "open the window".
Finally I had to change room after one night
Very noisy
reception not able to solve the problem and not very cooperative.Will not saty again in this hotel. |
|
|
guest rating:  (2,6 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, 41-50 years; travel season:November 2007 |
Close to tram is nice.
|
| Not a good business travellers hotel. |
|
|
| guest rating: (2,5 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, 31-40 years; travel season:October 2007 |
People serving breakfast were friendly.
|
| Price-Quality this is not a four star hotel. Many 3 star hotels offers better, modern rooms with more services in the room.
People at reception were not at all friendly - certainly at check-in and check-out |
|
|
guest rating:  (8,1 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, 41-50 years; travel season:September 2007 |
nice hotel
|
| a little bit expensive for the price I paid; In the fifth floor I still heard the road traffic from Av. Louise |
|
|
guest rating:  (4,3 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, 51-60 years; travel season:April 2007 |
Competitively priced, even if it were to be more correctly ranked as a three-star hotel without a central location
|
| This place seems uncared for, either by its staff or its customers. |
|
|
guest rating:  (8,6 of 10) |
| on business travelling as an individual, under 31 years; travel season:March 2007 |
| Impressive breakfast buffet, in particular Japanese style rice and soup. |
|
|
| guest rating: (7,3 of 10) |
| on business travelling as a group, 31-40 years; travel season:December 2006 |
| 1) Rooms are gorgeous, but front of the hotel is city tram = sligtly noisy.
2) It is good that I can use wireless LAN at free of charge. But only at the lobby area. Hopefully in the room, too. |
|
|
